<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dw="http://www.dreamwidth.org">
  <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-27:391042</id>
  <title>Ossamenta</title>
  <subtitle>(noun, plural - A collection of bones)</subtitle>
  <author>
    <name>ossamenta</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://ossamenta.dreamwidth.org/"/>
  <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="http://ossamenta.dreamwidth.org/data/atom"/>
  <updated>2013-03-24T16:30:56Z</updated>
  <dw:journal username="ossamenta" type="personal"/>
  <link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/"/>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-27:391042:31198</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://ossamenta.dreamwidth.org/31198.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="http://ossamenta.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=31198"/>
    <title>Some links to distract you from the miserable spring weather</title>
    <published>2013-03-24T16:30:56Z</published>
    <updated>2013-03-24T16:30:56Z</updated>
    <category term="books"/>
    <category term="dna"/>
    <category term="science"/>
    <category term="palaeontology"/>
    <category term="dating"/>
    <category term="medieval manuscripts"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">I'm not very impressed with March so far. Especially when compared to the unusually warm March of 2012: A year ago I went to Canterbury and walked along the river eating ice cream. I certainly wouldn't do it now. Quite frankly I'm more in the mood for curling up on the sofa with a hot drink and a good book. Thankfully yesterday's snow is mostly gone now, but the temperature is hovering around 0°C, mostly on the wrong side.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://s893.photobucket.com/user/ossamentaDW/media/Canterburymarch-12_zps0632a870.jpg.html" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://i893.photobucket.com/albums/ac137/ossamentaDW/Canterburymarch-12_zps0632a870.jpg" border="0" alt=" photo Canterburymarch-12_zps0632a870.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Pretty, sunny Canterbury...&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But I might at least pass on a few links and close the tabs:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- On my wish list: the unconventional paleoart book &lt;a href="http://www.lulu.com/shop/john-conway-and-cm-kosemen-and-darren-naish/all-yesterdays-unique-and-speculative-views-of-dinosaurs-and-other-prehistoric-animals/paperback/product-20538306.html"&gt;All yesterdays&lt;/a&gt;, rejecting the standard view of these extinct animals, and by comparison showing us what future paleontonlogists might have thought cats, monkeys and birds would have looked like if they only had the skeletons to go by. The &lt;a href="http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/tetrapod-zoology/2012/12/20/all-yesterdays-the-talks/"&gt;talks from the book launch&lt;/a&gt; are well worth watching, even if you have no budget to buy the book itself. Reviews by &lt;a href="http://whatsinjohnsfreezer.com/2013/03/17/all-yesterdays-review/"&gt;What's in Johns freezer?&lt;/a&gt; (a cool* anatomy blog) and &lt;a href="http://www.tor.com/blogs/2013/01/book-review-all-yesterdays-daren-naish-john-conway-cm-koseman-scott-hartman"&gt;Tor.com&lt;/a&gt;, with several illustrations.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*: no pun intended....&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- I was linked to a piece in Science Nordic about &lt;a href="http://sciencenordic.com/fish-corrupt-carbon-14-dating"&gt;how fish corrupt carbon dating of pots&lt;/a&gt;, which unfortunately lacked several details from the &lt;a href="http://scitech.au.dk/roemer/mar13/gamle-fisk-snyder-arkaeologer/"&gt;original Danish source&lt;/a&gt; (not the Danish version of the Science Nordic page, that's the same as the English one). For starters, it's not the pots that are radio carbon dated, as most people interested in archaeology would realise, as pottery itself doesn't contain carbon (if it has been tempered by organic material, this would likely burn away in the firing), but burnt food crusts on the inside. Due to the &lt;a href="http://www.canadianarchaeology.ca/radiocarbon/card/reserv.htm"&gt;reservoir effect&lt;/a&gt; of marine life, if the burnt food contained fish, shellfish or other marine creatures, the radiocarbon dating could be off by several hundred or thousand years. And since it is hard to tell what any carbonised crust originally contained, it would be problematic to use radio carbon dating of food crusts alone as a way to, for example, date the introduction of pottery.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- The &lt;a href="https://tcld.wordpress.com/2013/03/15/book-of-kells-now-free-to-view-online/"&gt;Book of Kells&lt;/a&gt;, a 9th century illuminated Irish gospel manuscript, is now online!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- and from the hilarious site &lt;a href="http://wtfevolution.tumblr.com/"&gt;WTF evolution?&lt;/a&gt; (go home evolution, you're drunk!), scientists are trying to &lt;a href="http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/03/15/resurrecting-the-extinct-frog-with-a-stomach-for-a-womb/"&gt;resurrect a frog species that used its stomach as a womb&lt;/a&gt;. It's a recent extinction (and discovery, too: it was discovered in 1972, and extinct in 1983) so they have plenty of genetic material to work with. And considering the world wide threat to frogs due to habitat loss, it may be a good thing to have experience in - we certainly will need it again.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=ossamenta&amp;ditemid=31198" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-27:391042:26279</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://ossamenta.dreamwidth.org/26279.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="http://ossamenta.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=26279"/>
    <title>Battlefield archaeology and medieval dirty fingers</title>
    <published>2012-05-04T18:26:30Z</published>
    <updated>2012-05-04T18:26:30Z</updated>
    <category term="human osteology"/>
    <category term="battlefield archaeology"/>
    <category term="post-medieval"/>
    <category term="science"/>
    <category term="medieval manuscripts"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">I can't believe it's been over a month since my last post. Not much blog-worthy has happened here, though, so you've hardly missed much. That said, I've seen a couple of interesting research news in the last few days/weeks that I thought I'd share:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1632 is a well-known date in Swedish history. A Thirty Years' War battle in Lützen, in present-day Germany, mostly known for peasoup fog ("Lützendimma" in Swedish) and the death of the Swedish king, Gustaf II Adolf. A German research team has started to &lt;a href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,830203,00.html"&gt;excavate one of the mass graves&lt;/a&gt; and hopefully they will get some interesting results from the analysis. As is common today, they will do isotope analysis to see if they can see where the soldiers came from. Not only were Swedes and Germans (or people from what later would become Germany) present, but both sides had hired mercenaries. The article talked about the placement of the bodies in the grave ("They were, at least, carefully laid to rest. The bodies were gathered from the battlefield and placed in a grave next to the street, arranged in two rows with their legs facing each other."), but looking at the pictures in the &lt;a href="http://www.spiegel.de/fotostrecke/fotostrecke-81678-3.html"&gt;photo gallery&lt;/a&gt;, some men are lying face-down! I wonder if that was a common phenomenon (getting smelly? not caring &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; much for strangers/soldiers), or for some reason or other these persons either had the most horrible face wounds or the people burying them (probably civilians from Lützen) wanted to shame them after death.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And thanks to Katrin Kania (&lt;a href="http://togs-from-bogs.blogspot.com"&gt;A stitch in time&lt;/a&gt;), I found an interesting study on &lt;a href="http://www.jhna.org/index.php/past-issues/volume-2-issue-1-2/129-dirty-books"&gt;the use of medieval prayerbooks&lt;/a&gt; - by using wear patterns from residual oil and dirt left by the readers' fingers! Which texts were mostly read? How were the books held? Modern science is so cool! (even when it doesn't involve cloning dinosaurs for T.rex burgers)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=ossamenta&amp;ditemid=26279" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
</feed>
